[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D73860: [lldb/StringPrinter] Avoid reading garbage in uninitialized strings
Vedant Kumar via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 3 16:22:28 PST 2020
vsk added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/data-formatter/data-formatter-stl/libcxx/string/main.cpp:29
+ if (sizeof(std::string) == sizeof(garbage_string_sso))
+ memcpy((void *)&garbage1, &garbage_string_sso, sizeof(std::string));
+ if (sizeof(std::string) == sizeof(garbage_string_long))
----------------
shafik wrote:
> While I get what you are doing here, we know he structure of libc++ SSO implementation and we are manually building a corrupt one, this is fragile to changes in the implementation.
>
> I don't have an immediate suggestion for an alternative approach but if we stick with this we should stick a big comment explaining this, perhaps laying out the assumptions of the internal layout we are assuming and maybe some sanity checks maybe using `offsetof` to verify fields exist and are where we expect them to be.
I don't see how this is fragile. The structure of libc++'s SSO implementation is ABI, and is unlikely to change (esp. not in a way that turns either one of the garbage strings into a valid string). I've left comments explaining what's wrong with both of the garbage strings, but can leave a pointer to https://joellaity.com/2020/01/31/string.html for more info?
================
Comment at: lldb/source/DataFormatters/StringPrinter.cpp:64
+static bool isInHalfOpenRange(uint8_t *Needle, uint8_t *Start, uint8_t *End) {
+ return uintptr_t(Needle) >= uintptr_t(Start) &&
+ uintptr_t(Needle) < uintptr_t(End);
----------------
shafik wrote:
> can we use `reinterpret_cast` as opposed to what is basically a C-style cast. This also has the advantage of pointing out potentially dangerous code for future persons refactoring this code.
As written, I think the casts to `uintptr_t` convey the assumptions being made here.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D73860/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D73860
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list