[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D71306: [RFC] Change how we deal with optional dependencies
Shafik Yaghmour via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Dec 11 09:05:09 PST 2019
shafik added a comment.
In D71306#1779379 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71306#1779379>, @labath wrote:
> Besides lldb developers, another category we should consider are llvm (or clang or lld, ...) developers who know nothing about lldb, but they ended up building it because they specified LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=all. These people probably don't want to figure out how to install libedit, or how to disable it, but if the default config "just works" for them, they'd be happy to build lldb and make sure their patch doesn't break it. Optimizing for this experience may be even more important than core lldb developers, since there's fewer of the latter and they usually just configure lldb once.
I want to seconded this, as someone who supports expression parsing which is depends on clang components which may be under active development such as `ASTImporter` having them being able to build lldb w/o a hassle is an important consideration if we want to them to be proactive and run the lldb test suite etc...
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
More information about the lldb-commits