[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D68980: [LLDB] [test] Pass --target=<arch>-windows-msvc to clang-cl

Stella Stamenova via Phabricator via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Oct 15 11:45:32 PDT 2019


stella.stamenova added a comment.

In D68980#1709931 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68980#1709931>, @labath wrote:

> In D68980#1709884 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D68980#1709884>, @stella.stamenova wrote:
>
> > The two things that come to mind are the path to clang-cl (which is sometimes a clang build and sometimes installed on the system as part of a VS installation or an LLVM installation) as well as the path to the linker when it is needed. This is most often an issue in the case of a VS install - I don't remember all the details any more, but I believe that before Zach added the script, we were often picking up the wrong clang-cl and ending up not being able to compile the tests at all.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Was this during a standalone lldb build? In a non-standalone build, lit should definitely prefer the just-built clang/lld (and if it doesn't, it should be fixed to do that). The situation is more complicated for a standalone build because the clang binary is sort of out of our control. But, in this case, I don't see how having build.py around can help, because the information about which clang to use has to come externally anyway...


Both. Again, it's been a long time, but when we use VS for building, the environment already contains a path to clang-cl so regardless of whether the build is standalone or not, the build gets confused about which clang-cl to use. @mstorsjo might want to update the tests to use clang-cl but then make sure that the update works on the Windows Buildbot (or similar environment) before committing.


Repository:
  rLLDB LLDB

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D68980/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D68980





More information about the lldb-commits mailing list