[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D64881: [Cmake] Use the modern way to find Python when possible

[Stella Stamenova via Phabricator via lldb-commits]

stella.stamenova added a comment.

Re: Windows CMake: I am not sure, I'd have to do look into it further.

On a separate note: I haven't looked into it yet, but we have a setup to run the LLDB tests on Ubuntu and that started failing somewhat recently with some Swig and Python errors. For example:

  Unable to load lldb extension module.  Possible reasons for this include:
    1) LLDB was built with LLDB_DISABLE_PYTHON=1
    2) PYTHONPATH and PYTHONHOME are not set correctly.  PYTHONHOME should refer to
       the version of Python that LLDB built and linked against, and PYTHONPATH
       should contain the Lib directory for the same python distro, as well as the
       location of LLDB's site-packages folder.
    3) A different version of Python than that which was built against is exported in
       the system's PATH environment variable, causing conflicts.
    4) The executable '/home/e2admin/vstsdrive/_work/29/b/bin/lldb' could not be found.  Please check 
       that it exists and is executable.
  Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "/home/e2admin/vstsdrive/_work/29/s/lldb/test/dotest.py", line 7, in <module>
      lldbsuite.test.run_suite()
    File "/home/e2admin/vstsdrive/_work/29/s/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/dotest.py", line 1268, in run_suite
      import lldb
  ImportError: No module named 'lldb'

I am  not sure how this change is going to affect that - better or worse?


Repository:
  rLLDB LLDB

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D64881/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D64881