[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D64599: [LanguageRuntime] Move CPPLanguageRuntime into a plugin

Pavel Labath via Phabricator via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jul 11 14:38:51 PDT 2019

labath added inline comments.

Comment at: source/Plugins/ExpressionParser/Clang/ClangExpressionDeclMap.cpp:55
 #include "Plugins/Language/CPlusPlus/CPlusPlusLanguage.h"
+#include "Plugins/LanguageRuntime/CPlusPlus/CPPLanguageRuntime.h"
compnerd wrote:
> xiaobai wrote:
> > JDevlieghere wrote:
> > > What's the benefit of making this a separate plugin, as compared to making it part of `Plugins/Language/CPlusPlus`? 
> > I view LanguageRuntimes as distinct from Languages and thus I think they should go into their own plugins. However, I'm not against moving this to `Plugins/Language/CPlusPlus` if you think it would make more sense to do so for another reason (e.g. less plugins overall?)
> We do need the abstraction since there are multiple C++ runtimes: c++, stdc++, MSVCPRT, stlport, etc.  Each one is slightly different.  Furthermore, libstdc++ supported the GNU and Solaris ABIs, libc++ only does itanium, MSVCPRT only does MSVC ABI.  So, we need to have some layer to differentiate between the various ABIs and just general C++ language support.
That is true. However, I'm not sure whether the current boundary actually makes sense. E.g. the c++ language plugin implements pretty printers for both libc++ and libstdc++.



More information about the lldb-commits mailing list