[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D63540: Fix lookup of symbols at the same address with no size vs. size

Jan Kratochvil via Phabricator via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jun 27 12:25:40 PDT 2019


jankratochvil marked 4 inline comments as done.
jankratochvil added a comment.

In D63540#1549977 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D63540#1549977>, @labath wrote:

> Why was it necessary to change the iteration order here?


No, it was an accidental leftover.

Thanks for the review.



================
Comment at: lldb/lit/SymbolFile/sizeless-symbol.test:1
+# RUN: %clang %S/Inputs/sizeless-symbol.s -c -o %t.o
+# RUN: %lldb %t.o -s %s -o quit | FileCheck %s
----------------
labath wrote:
> Are you sure this will work whatever the host triple happens to be ? (you can try it out by manually forcing a couple of random targets with the `-target` argument). I have a feeling the `.type`, `.size`, etc. directives are a feature of elf-targetting assemblers. If that doesn't work you can always force a specific triple with the `-target` command.
Yes, you are right.


================
Comment at: lldb/lit/SymbolFile/sizeless-symbol.test:4
+
+image lookup --address 1
+# CHECK: Summary: sizeless-symbol.test.tmp.o`sizeful
----------------
labath wrote:
> As you're fixing this bug by changing the way symbol size is computed, it would be nice to also put (and check it's output) a "image dump symtab" command here. That would also make it clear what are the assumptions the following "lookup" commands are operating under.
I only hope the `image dump symtab` output ordering is stable.


Repository:
  rLLDB LLDB

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D63540/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D63540





More information about the lldb-commits mailing list