[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D63540: Fix lookup of symbols at the same address with no size vs. size
Jan Kratochvil via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jun 27 12:25:40 PDT 2019
jankratochvil marked 4 inline comments as done.
jankratochvil added a comment.
In D63540#1549977 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D63540#1549977>, @labath wrote:
> Why was it necessary to change the iteration order here?
No, it was an accidental leftover.
Thanks for the review.
================
Comment at: lldb/lit/SymbolFile/sizeless-symbol.test:1
+# RUN: %clang %S/Inputs/sizeless-symbol.s -c -o %t.o
+# RUN: %lldb %t.o -s %s -o quit | FileCheck %s
----------------
labath wrote:
> Are you sure this will work whatever the host triple happens to be ? (you can try it out by manually forcing a couple of random targets with the `-target` argument). I have a feeling the `.type`, `.size`, etc. directives are a feature of elf-targetting assemblers. If that doesn't work you can always force a specific triple with the `-target` command.
Yes, you are right.
================
Comment at: lldb/lit/SymbolFile/sizeless-symbol.test:4
+
+image lookup --address 1
+# CHECK: Summary: sizeless-symbol.test.tmp.o`sizeful
----------------
labath wrote:
> As you're fixing this bug by changing the way symbol size is computed, it would be nice to also put (and check it's output) a "image dump symtab" command here. That would also make it clear what are the assumptions the following "lookup" commands are operating under.
I only hope the `image dump symtab` output ordering is stable.
Repository:
rLLDB LLDB
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D63540/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D63540
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list