[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D61779: FuncUnwinders: General clean up and optimization

[Greg Clayton via Phabricator via lldb-commits]

clayborg added inline comments.


================
Comment at: include/lldb/Symbol/FuncUnwinders.h:117
+  class LazyPlan {
+    lldb::UnwindPlanSP m_plan_sp;
+
----------------
labath wrote:
> clayborg wrote:
> > maybe use:
> > 
> > ```
> > llvm::Optional<lldb::UnwindPlanSP> m_plan_sp;
> > ```
> > 
> > Then just check if it has no value, and if so compute and set it either to a valid shared pointer or an empty one?
> That would work, but it would increase the size of the FuncUnwinders struct by about 80 bytes (8 bytes for each LazyPlan object). I can do that, but given that "uncomputed value" trick is internal to the class and does not leak out or affect the implementation, it seemed like a worthwhile optimization to me.
Actually isn't there a pointer union class that can steal bool bits from the aligned values and not increase the size?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D61779/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D61779