[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D60001: Allow partial UUID matching in Minidump core file plug-in

Greg Clayton via Phabricator via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Apr 2 09:01:33 PDT 2019


clayborg marked an inline comment as done.
clayborg added inline comments.


================
Comment at: source/Plugins/Process/minidump/ProcessMinidump.cpp:401
+      basename_module_spec.GetUUID().Clear();
+      basename_module_spec.GetFileSpec().GetDirectory().Clear();
+      module_sp = GetTarget().GetSharedModule(basename_module_spec, &error);
----------------
labath wrote:
> clayborg wrote:
> > labath wrote:
> > > What will happen if you just delete this line? Based on my experiments, I believe we should still end up looking through the exec-search-paths list. However, the test does not seem to be modifying this setting, so it's not clear to me how it is even finding the binary in the first place. What's the mechanism you're relying on for the lookup in the test?
> > It doesn't work without clearing the fullpath here and I didn't want to modify the current behavior of the exec search paths in here just in case it would affect others that were depending on a certain behavior.
> Ok, I don't think we have to block on that, but I'd still like to understand how the files are found in the first place. Right now, I don't understand it because:
> a) they are not in exec-search-path
> b) (I think) they are not in CWD
> So the fact that they are found may be accidental and prone to breakage.
I added the build directory to the "settings set target.exec-search-paths" in the tests in case this changes in the future.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D60001/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D60001





More information about the lldb-commits mailing list