[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D59235: Remove Support for DWARF64
Greg Clayton via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Mar 12 07:19:21 PDT 2019
clayborg added a comment.
In D59235#1425443 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59235#1425443>, @zturner wrote:
> In D59235#1425436 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D59235#1425436>, @clayborg wrote:
>
> > My main concern with the LLVM DWARF parser is all of the asserts in the code. If you attempt to use a DWARFDIE without first checking it for validity, it will crash on you instead of returning a good error or default value. That makes me really nervous as we shouldn't just crash the debugger. The switching over won't be too hard, just the fallout from the LLDB versions of the class that do error checking and return good error/default values and LLVM being very strict.
>
>
> Sure, I'm prepared to deal all that appropriately. I don't plan to regress LLDB's stability in the process.
Sounds good.
> That's why for now I'm just doing very small preliminary steps to get the two interfaces to be closer to each other and simplify the problem space. We can worry about the asserts and all of that when we actually start moving pieces of LLDB to use LLVM's classes (which isn't in this patch).
I look forward to seeing this transition. I was planning on working on that right before I left Apple, but I left and didn't have the time after starting a new job. I will be happy to help review any changes as I did a lot of cleanup in the LLVM DWARF parser in preparation for the transition, so we should be in good shape.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59235/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59235
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list