[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D58792: Add "operator bool" to SB APIs
Greg Clayton via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Mar 1 11:43:29 PST 2019
clayborg added a comment.
In D58792#1414964 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D58792#1414964>, @labath wrote:
> In D58792#1414191 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D58792#1414191>, @shafik wrote:
> > It stood out to me that some of the conversions were not `const` and I can see that `IsValid` is not consistently `const` across the API but after talking to @jingham it is unfortunately something we can't change.
> Yes, that is unfortunate. I can think of three things that we could do differently though:
> 1. add a `const` version of `IsValid` where it is missing, and have and always-const `operator bool` which uses that
> 2. give up on constness and just have a non-const `operator bool` everywhere
> 3. add a const `operator bool` everywhere, and have `IsValid` (const or non-const) call into that
"const" is useless when your class contains a shared pointer or a unique pointer. It also changes the API mangling which we can't do. So I vote for give up on const as you can call non const methods in any shared and unique pointers because const is only protecting the pointer from changing.
> Each option has different tradeoffs, and it's not really clear to me which one is better. I am happy to implement whichever you think is best.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
More information about the lldb-commits