[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D57475: [Reproducers] Add SBReproducer macros
Jonas Devlieghere via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jan 31 10:29:07 PST 2019
JDevlieghere marked an inline comment as done.
JDevlieghere added inline comments.
================
Comment at: source/API/SBBlock.cpp:52-58
+ SB_RECORD_METHOD_CONST_NO_ARGS(bool, SBBlock, IsValid);
+ return m_opaque_ptr != NULL;
+}
bool SBBlock::IsInlined() const {
+ SB_RECORD_METHOD_CONST_NO_ARGS(bool, SBBlock, IsInlined);
+
----------------
labath wrote:
> It looks like some functions have a newline after the macro, and some don't. What's the reason for that?
It depends on whether there was a newline before or not. So
```
foo { bar }
```
will not have the newline, while
```
foo {
bar;
}
```
This happens because we insert the macro at the first loc, before the potentially existing `\n`. Getting this right for all cases and coding styles is tricky, so the tool doesn't try to get it right. It just inserts it there and relies on clang-format to fix the formatting.
Repository:
rLLDB LLDB
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D57475/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D57475
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list