[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D56822: [Reproducers] Tool to insert SBReproducer macros

Jonas Devlieghere via Phabricator via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jan 30 09:06:29 PST 2019

JDevlieghere added a comment.

In D56822#1376770 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D56822#1376770>, @labath wrote:

> So, if I understand this correctly, a constructor like `SBFoo::SBFoo(){}` will not be considered for macroization because it's empty? That doesn't sound right to me. Even an empty constructor has a side effect of constructing the object, which is something that I would expect to see recorded in the trace file. Is there some reason why it is hard/impossible to insert macros into these kinds of functions? If so, it may be worth just warning the user about their existence.
> A function with an empty body probably doesn't do anything interesting, so it may be possible to skip recording those, but I think it would make sense to record them nonetheless.

Ugh, I was confusing empty bodies with methods without a body (e.g. declarations). Empty bodies are definitely handled! I'll update the comment.



More information about the lldb-commits mailing list