[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D50478: Add support for artificial tail call frames
Vedant Kumar via Phabricator via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Oct 11 14:58:03 PDT 2018
vsk added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D50478#1262710, @stella.stamenova wrote:
> Unfortunately, the bots are broken because of the FileCheck issue, so I can't confirm with them, but I see a number of these tests fail in our local testing. Some fail on both Windows and Linux and some just fail on Linux. Here are the failing tests:
>
> Linux:
> lldb-Suite :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/disambiguate_call_site/TestDisambiguateCallSite.py
> lldb-Suite :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/disambiguate_paths_to_common_sink/TestDisambiguatePathsToCommonSink.py
> lldb-Suite :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/disambiguate_tail_call_seq/TestDisambiguateTailCallSeq.py
> lldb-Suite :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/inlining_and_tail_calls/TestInliningAndTailCalls.py
> lldb-Suite :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/sbapi_support/TestTailCallFrameSBAPI.py
> lldb-Suite :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/thread_step_out_message/TestArtificialFrameStepOutMessage.py
> lldb-Suite :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/unambiguous_sequence/TestUnambiguousTailCalls.py
>
> Windows:
> lldb-Suite :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/sbapi_support/TestTailCallFrameSBAPI.py
> lldb-Suite :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/thread_step_out_or_return/TestSteppingOutWithArtificialFrames.py
>
>
> Let me know what you need to investigate.
Strange, I didn't get any bot failure notifications in the days after this landed. Could you share the output from the failing tests?
Repository:
rLLDB LLDB
https://reviews.llvm.org/D50478
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list