[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D50478: Add support for artificial tail call frames

Vedant Kumar via Phabricator via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Oct 11 14:58:03 PDT 2018


vsk added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D50478#1262710, @stella.stamenova wrote:

> Unfortunately, the bots are broken because of the FileCheck issue, so I can't confirm with them, but I see a number of these tests fail in our local testing. Some fail on both Windows and Linux and some just fail on Linux. Here are the failing tests:
>
>   Linux:
>   lldb-Suite :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/disambiguate_call_site/TestDisambiguateCallSite.py
>   lldb-Suite :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/disambiguate_paths_to_common_sink/TestDisambiguatePathsToCommonSink.py
>   lldb-Suite :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/disambiguate_tail_call_seq/TestDisambiguateTailCallSeq.py
>   lldb-Suite :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/inlining_and_tail_calls/TestInliningAndTailCalls.py
>   lldb-Suite :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/sbapi_support/TestTailCallFrameSBAPI.py
>   lldb-Suite :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/thread_step_out_message/TestArtificialFrameStepOutMessage.py
>   lldb-Suite :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/unambiguous_sequence/TestUnambiguousTailCalls.py
>  
>   Windows:
>   lldb-Suite :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/sbapi_support/TestTailCallFrameSBAPI.py
>   lldb-Suite :: functionalities/tail_call_frames/thread_step_out_or_return/TestSteppingOutWithArtificialFrames.py
>
>
> Let me know what you need to investigate.


Strange, I didn't get any bot failure notifications in the days after this landed. Could you share the output from the failing tests?


Repository:
  rLLDB LLDB

https://reviews.llvm.org/D50478





More information about the lldb-commits mailing list