[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r341849 - Fix raw address breakpoints not resolving
Ted Woodward via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Sep 10 11:19:02 PDT 2018
Author: ted
Date: Mon Sep 10 11:19:01 2018
New Revision: 341849
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=341849&view=rev
Log:
Fix raw address breakpoints not resolving
Summary: An address breakpoint of the form "b 0x1000" won't resolve if it's created while the process isn't running. This patch deletes Address::SectionWasDeleted, renames Address::SectionWasDeletedPrivate to SectionWasDeleted (and makes it public), and changes the section check in Breakpoint::ModulesChanged back to its original form
Reviewers: jingham, #lldb
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: davide, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51816
Modified:
lldb/trunk/include/lldb/Core/Address.h
lldb/trunk/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/breakpoint/address_breakpoints/TestAddressBreakpoints.py
lldb/trunk/source/Breakpoint/Breakpoint.cpp
lldb/trunk/source/Core/Address.cpp
Modified: lldb/trunk/include/lldb/Core/Address.h
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/lldb/trunk/include/lldb/Core/Address.h?rev=341849&r1=341848&r2=341849&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- lldb/trunk/include/lldb/Core/Address.h (original)
+++ lldb/trunk/include/lldb/Core/Address.h Mon Sep 10 11:19:01 2018
@@ -525,11 +525,11 @@ public:
bool CalculateSymbolContextLineEntry(LineEntry &line_entry) const;
//------------------------------------------------------------------
- // Returns true if the section should be valid, but isn't because the shared
- // pointer to the section can't be reconstructed from a weak pointer that
- // contains a valid weak reference to a section. Returns false if the section
- // weak pointer has no reference to a section, or if the section is still
- // valid
+ // Returns true if the m_section_wp once had a reference to a valid section
+ // shared pointer, but no longer does. This can happen if we have an address
+ // from a module that gets unloaded and deleted. This function should only be
+ // called if GetSection() returns an empty shared pointer and you want to
+ // know if this address used to have a valid section.
//------------------------------------------------------------------
bool SectionWasDeleted() const;
@@ -539,15 +539,6 @@ protected:
//------------------------------------------------------------------
lldb::SectionWP m_section_wp; ///< The section for the address, can be NULL.
lldb::addr_t m_offset; ///< Offset into section if \a m_section_wp is valid...
-
- //------------------------------------------------------------------
- // Returns true if the m_section_wp once had a reference to a valid section
- // shared pointer, but no longer does. This can happen if we have an address
- // from a module that gets unloaded and deleted. This function should only be
- // called if GetSection() returns an empty shared pointer and you want to
- // know if this address used to have a valid section.
- //------------------------------------------------------------------
- bool SectionWasDeletedPrivate() const;
};
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
Modified: lldb/trunk/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/breakpoint/address_breakpoints/TestAddressBreakpoints.py
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/lldb/trunk/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/breakpoint/address_breakpoints/TestAddressBreakpoints.py?rev=341849&r1=341848&r2=341849&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- lldb/trunk/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/breakpoint/address_breakpoints/TestAddressBreakpoints.py (original)
+++ lldb/trunk/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/breakpoint/address_breakpoints/TestAddressBreakpoints.py Mon Sep 10 11:19:01 2018
@@ -97,3 +97,40 @@ class AddressBreakpointTestCase(TestBase
# The hit count for the breakpoint should now be 2.
self.assertTrue(breakpoint.GetHitCount() == 2)
+
+
+
+ def test_address_breakpoint_set_before_launch(self):
+ """Test that an address bp set before the process is launched works correctly."""
+ self.build()
+
+ exe = self.getBuildArtifact("a.out")
+
+ # Create a target by the debugger.
+ target = self.dbg.CreateTarget(exe)
+ self.assertTrue(target, VALID_TARGET)
+
+ # get the address of the symbol "main"
+ sc_list = target.FindSymbols("main", lldb.eSymbolTypeCode)
+ symbol = sc_list.GetContextAtIndex(0).GetSymbol()
+ address = symbol.GetStartAddress().GetFileAddress()
+
+ # BreakpointCreateBySBAddress will resolve the address, causing this
+ # test to always pass, so use runCmd
+ self.runCmd("break set -a " + str(address))
+
+ # Disable ASLR. This will allow us to actually test (on platforms that support this flag)
+ # that the breakpoint was able to track the module.
+
+ launch_info = lldb.SBLaunchInfo(None)
+ flags = launch_info.GetLaunchFlags()
+ flags &= ~lldb.eLaunchFlagDisableASLR
+ launch_info.SetLaunchFlags(flags)
+
+ error = lldb.SBError()
+
+ process = target.Launch(launch_info, error)
+ self.assertTrue(process, PROCESS_IS_VALID)
+ self.expect("process status", STOPPED_DUE_TO_BREAKPOINT,
+ substrs=["stop reason = breakpoint 1.1"])
+
Modified: lldb/trunk/source/Breakpoint/Breakpoint.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/lldb/trunk/source/Breakpoint/Breakpoint.cpp?rev=341849&r1=341848&r2=341849&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- lldb/trunk/source/Breakpoint/Breakpoint.cpp (original)
+++ lldb/trunk/source/Breakpoint/Breakpoint.cpp Mon Sep 10 11:19:01 2018
@@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ void Breakpoint::ModulesChanged(ModuleLi
// address that we haven't resolved to a section yet. So we'll have to
// look in all the new modules to resolve this location. Otherwise, if
// it was set in this module, re-resolve it here.
- if (section_sp && section_sp->GetModule() == module_sp) {
+ if (!section_sp || section_sp->GetModule() == module_sp) {
if (!seen)
seen = true;
Modified: lldb/trunk/source/Core/Address.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/lldb/trunk/source/Core/Address.cpp?rev=341849&r1=341848&r2=341849&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- lldb/trunk/source/Core/Address.cpp (original)
+++ lldb/trunk/source/Core/Address.cpp Mon Sep 10 11:19:01 2018
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ addr_t Address::GetFileAddress() const {
// We have a valid file range, so we can return the file based address by
// adding the file base address to our offset
return sect_file_addr + m_offset;
- } else if (SectionWasDeletedPrivate()) {
+ } else if (SectionWasDeleted()) {
// Used to have a valid section but it got deleted so the offset doesn't
// mean anything without the section
return LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ addr_t Address::GetLoadAddress(Target *t
return sect_load_addr + m_offset;
}
}
- } else if (SectionWasDeletedPrivate()) {
+ } else if (SectionWasDeleted()) {
// Used to have a valid section but it got deleted so the offset doesn't
// mean anything without the section
return LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
@@ -761,12 +761,6 @@ bool Address::Dump(Stream *s, ExecutionC
}
bool Address::SectionWasDeleted() const {
- if (GetSection())
- return false;
- return SectionWasDeletedPrivate();
-}
-
-bool Address::SectionWasDeletedPrivate() const {
lldb::SectionWP empty_section_wp;
// If either call to "std::weak_ptr::owner_before(...) value returns true,
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list