[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D47992: [lldb-mi] Correct error processing in exec-next command.

[Alexander Polyakov via Phabricator via lldb-commits]

apolyakov added a comment.

If you look at `bool CMICmdCmdExecContinue::Execute()`, you'll see that there are cases in which we need a flexible way to finish MI command(specific action in error case for example). We have a few options: not to add such an utility function, add and use it in simple situations where we just want to check on SBError status or we may create utility function with lambda functions in which user could specify actions he needs. What are your thoughts about this?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D47992