[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D44379: [cmake] Fix standalone+LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB builds (pr36687)

Pavel Labath via Phabricator via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Mar 14 03:09:12 PDT 2018


labath added inline comments.


================
Comment at: cmake/modules/LLDBConfig.cmake:349
 
-if (HAVE_LIBPTHREAD)
-  list(APPEND system_libs pthread)
-endif(HAVE_LIBPTHREAD)
-
-if (HAVE_LIBDL)
-  list(APPEND system_libs ${CMAKE_DL_LIBS})
+if(UNIX)
+  set(CMAKE_THREAD_PREFER_PTHREAD TRUE)
----------------
krytarowski wrote:
> labath wrote:
> > krytarowski wrote:
> > > Why UNIX here?
> > > 
> > > Why CMAKE_THREAD_PREFER_PTHREAD? It looks like used only on IRIX and that one is not going anywhere nowadays. (And certainly similarly to other commercial OSes, due to legal work/removing not-owned code, it's not possible to push it to Open-Source).
> > > 
> > > Assuming that system_libs can accept "-pthreads", this patch looks good to me.
> > For the second part, I copied it out of the llvm's build scripts without looking at what it does (with the idea of trying to maintain a consistent build). However, if it's only used at irix, then I guess I can remove that.
> > 
> > The UNIX part is also inspired by llvm, but I simplified it a bit (they use CYGWIN OR NOT WINDOWS). I was assuming the idea was to make sure we use native thread support and not pthreads (which are present there sometimes, I think).
> I see, I would use `CYGWIN OR NOT WINDOWS` without changing the logic.
> 
> Keeping here `CMAKE_THREAD_PREFER_PTHREAD` does not make harm. non-pthreading on UNIX systems is rather in extinct and remnant of 90ties (Minix has something like that.. and lack of pthreads).
> 
> The UNIX part looks correct.
Thanks, I'll update the logic to match and submit.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D44379





More information about the lldb-commits mailing list