[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r322339 - When parsing the target.xml register file, if no architecture has

[Pavel Labath via lldb-commits]

The budding gdb-client test suite <https://reviews.llvm.org/D42195>
might be an option for this.

On 29 January 2018 at 18:17, Jason Molenda via lldb-commits
<lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 28, 2018, at 9:59 PM, Davide Italiano <dccitaliano at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 5:26 PM, Davide Italiano <dccitaliano at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 5:16 PM, Jason Molenda via lldb-commits
>>> <lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>> Author: jmolenda
>>>> Date: Thu Jan 11 17:16:13 2018
>>>> New Revision: 322339
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=322339&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> When parsing the target.xml register file, if no architecture has
>>>> been specified yet (either by the user, or by one of the lldb
>>>> extensions like qHostInfo or qProcessInfo), and the target.xml
>>>> includes a <architecture> tag specifying x86_64, set the architecture
>>>> appropriately.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure what we can expect to see in the <architecture> tag, so
>>>> I'm only doing this for x86_64 right now where I've seen "i386:x86_64"
>>>> used.  I've seen a target.xml from a jtag board that sends just "arm"
>>>> because it doesn't know more specifically what type of board it is
>>>> connected to...
>>>>
>>>> <rdar://problem/29908970>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Jason,
>>> is there a way to test this change?
>>>
>>
>> ping? Any news on this front?
>
> Thanks for the reminder.  I need to look at doing this - I'm in the middle of another patch right now but I'll return to this after that.
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-commits mailing list
> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits