[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D39436: Add regex support to file (-f) and module (-s) breakpoint options.

[Jim Ingham via lldb-commits]

Not directly, though you can get the ID from the breakpoint you've made, and then do:

debugger.HandleCommand("breakpoint modify -m 0 %d"%(ID))

Jim


> On Oct 31, 2017, at 8:32 AM, Don Hinton <hintonda at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Btw, is there a way to pass the '-m' option via the SB API?  I'd like to exclude matches in comments when using BreakpointCreateBySourceRegex.
> 
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Don Hinton <hintonda at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:12 AM Don Hinton <hintonda at gmail.com> wrote:
> There have been a few suggestions that I could just use a script to solve this "problem" -- poor startup performance of clangdiag.
> 
> However, this patch was not submitted to solve a particular problem.  It was submitted in response to Jim's suggestion:
> 
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Jim Ingham <jingham at apple.com> wrote:
> Yeah, that would be easy to implement from the command line, maybe add a --file-is-regex flag or something.
> 
> From the SB API it would be better to have something like:
> 
> SBFileList SBTarget.GetFileListMatchingRegex("regex")
> 
> Please file an enhancement request for these of hack'em in if you're so motivated.
> 
> clangdiag was only provided as a motivating example.
> 
> Fair point, I had forgotten about that.  That said, I'm honestly still not that big of a fan.   It's no secret that I have a higher bar than others for options and API additions, but to me the potential use this particular option + SB API would get is not sufficient to justify the long term maintenance burden associated with having it.
> 
> I'm not that familiar with the SB API part, but will investigate, and try to come up with a better motivation.
> 
> Thanks again for the suggestions and feedback...
>  
> 
>