[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D35784: [LLD][MIPS] Fix Address::GetAddressClass() to return correct AddressClass based on the load address

[Greg Clayton via Phabricator via lldb-commits]

clayborg added a comment.

I was out on a week long vacation, sorry for the delay. The main questions is: should symbols with NOTYPE actually be included in any address lookups. I would vote for no as how can 1 address resolve to more than one section. That doesn't make sense to me. One address should resolve to one and only one section. Sounds like the NOTYPE symbols should just say they don't have a section. Thoughts?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D35784