[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D35740: Fix PR33875 by distinguishing between DWO and clang modules

David Blaikie via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jul 21 17:51:09 PDT 2017

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 4:05 PM Greg Clayton via Phabricator <
reviews at reviews.llvm.org> wrote:

> clayborg accepted this revision.
> clayborg added a comment.
> Looks like there already is a test case that was failing as Jim mentioned.
> Accepting based on that.

Ah, I was thinking more a test that would've failed when LLDB regressed
(regardless of whether Clang was still producing this DWARF or not) - does
LLDB have tests like that? (either binary, asm, or some other terse way of
writing DWARF directly to test "does LLDB do the right thing with this
DWARF" sort of tests?)

> https://reviews.llvm.org/D35740
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20170722/4c535386/attachment.html>

More information about the lldb-commits mailing list