[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D32832: Make ConstString creation and access lockfree
Jim Ingham via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed May 3 15:19:02 PDT 2017
It isn't uncommon for folks to debug programs with all the debug information for the whole system available. In those cases, what looks to the user like a normal sized application is actually a very large one as far as lldb's global string pool is concerned. My experience is that whenever you say "size of debug information"/"number of symbols" won't get larger than X, not very much time will generally show you wrong. So I'm leery of this change.
> On May 3, 2017, at 3:04 PM, Scott Smith via Phabricator via lldb-commits <lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> scott.smith added a comment.
> Note, I don't expect you guys to want this as is, since the # of buckets can't grow, and thus for very large applications this will behave O(n) instead of O(1). Before I bother to convert this to 1M skip lists (instead of 1M singly linked lists), is this something you're at all interested in? It brings execution time of my test down from ~4.5s to ~3.5s (lldb -b -o 'b main' -o 'run' my_test_program).
> rL LLVM
> lldb-commits mailing list
> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
More information about the lldb-commits