[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D32434: ObjectFileELF: Fix symbol lookup in bss section

Zachary Turner via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Apr 24 14:31:38 PDT 2017


Which C compilers do we have that are not capable of producing ELF
binaries?   GCC on Windows maybe?  That's not even a supported test
configuration.

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 2:29 PM Pavel Labath via Phabricator <
reviews at reviews.llvm.org> wrote:

> labath added a comment.
>
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D32434#735877, @eugene wrote:
>
> > Is it  really necessary to check in binary ELF files?
> >  I understand that we don't always have a C compiler capable of
> producing ELF files, but maybe it's ok to skip this test on those platforms.
>
>
> That is something very I am very much trying to avoid, as that means
> people on those platforms cannot validate their changes. (And I'm not sure
> if I even want to be running a compiler for a test at this level, as that
> introduces a level of nondeterminism.)
>
> That said, I do agree we should be carefully about adding lots of binary
> bloat. I have been trying to put this off until we have more of these, but
> maybe I could try integrating this with obj2yaml -- it does not seem to
> preserve program headers, but I don't actually need those for this test.
>
>
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D32434
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20170424/52729f6f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the lldb-commits mailing list