[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D32149: Correct handling NetBSD core(5) files with threads
Kamil Rytarowski via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Apr 21 19:27:13 PDT 2017
Thanks! I'm working on this, I will test new code soon and submit to review.
On 20.04.2017 15:51, Zachary Turner wrote:
> Note that getAsInteger returns false on success, so be careful!
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 6:09 AM Pavel Labath via Phabricator
> <reviews at reviews.llvm.org <mailto:reviews at reviews.llvm.org>> wrote:
>
> labath added a comment.
>
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D32149#731920, @krytarowski wrote:
>
> > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D32149#731887, @labath wrote:
> >
> > > A test would infinitely times more valuable then a demo script.
> What is the tiniest core file you can produce on NetBSD? (on linux
> we've gotten them down to about 20K) Then we could check that in and
> write a test for it...
> >
> >
> > This is something I wanted to bring to the dev mailing list.
> >
> > I wanted to prepare at least three tests, if possible four:
> >
> > - one thread (if possible two variations: signal to one particular
> thread + signal to all threads)
> > - multiple threads (signal to one particular thread + signal to
> all threads)
> >
> > And this in combination of all supported targets (x86_64, i386,
> etc).
> >
> > Emitting SIGABRT for such program gives core of size 97kilobytes:
> >
> > ``` int main(){for(;;);} ```
> >
> > I will write assembly programs for the above cases, without libc.
>
>
> Cool, I am looking forward to the results.
>
>
>
> ================
> Comment at: source/Plugins/Process/elf-core/ProcessElfCore.cpp:795
> +
> + if ((note.n_name == "NetBSD-CORE") &&
> + (note.n_type == NETBSD::NT_PROCINFO)) {
> ----------------
> How about `StringRef name = note.n_name;`
>
>
> ================
> Comment at: source/Plugins/Process/elf-core/ProcessElfCore.cpp:803
> + m_auxv = DataExtractor(note_data);
> + } else if ((note.n_name.substr(0, 12) == "NetBSD-CORE@")) {
> + switch (arch.GetMachine()) {
> ----------------
> Then this can be
> ```
> else if (name.consume_front("NetBSD-CORE@")) {
> ...
> if (name.getAsInteger(0, tid))
> error...
> ```
>
>
> ================
> Comment at: source/Plugins/Process/elf-core/ProcessElfCore.cpp:848
> + if (siglwp == 0) {
> + std::for_each(
> + m_thread_data.begin(), m_thread_data.end(),
> ----------------
> `for (auto &data: m_thread_data) data.signo = signo` seems shorter,
> more understandable, and consistent with other usages in this file.
>
>
> ================
> Comment at: source/Plugins/Process/elf-core/ProcessElfCore.cpp:856
> +
> + for (auto it = m_thread_data.begin(); it !=
> m_thread_data.end(); ++it) {
> + if (it->tid == siglwp) {
> ----------------
> This could also be a range-based for.
>
>
> Repository:
> rL LLVM
>
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D32149
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20170422/4d5edf69/attachment.sig>
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list