[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r286093 - [lldb] Fix -Waggressive-loop-optimizations warning
Vedant Kumar via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Nov 6 18:39:37 PST 2016
Author: vedantk
Date: Sun Nov 6 20:39:37 2016
New Revision: 286093
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=286093&view=rev
Log:
[lldb] Fix -Waggressive-loop-optimizations warning
We shouldn't access past the end of an array, even if we think that the
layout of the struct containing the array is always what we expect. The
compiler is free to optimize away the stores as undefined behavior, and
in fact, GCC 6.2.1 claims it will do exactly this.
Modified:
lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/ObjectFile/Mach-O/ObjectFileMachO.cpp
Modified: lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/ObjectFile/Mach-O/ObjectFileMachO.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/ObjectFile/Mach-O/ObjectFileMachO.cpp?rev=286093&r1=286092&r2=286093&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/ObjectFile/Mach-O/ObjectFileMachO.cpp (original)
+++ lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/ObjectFile/Mach-O/ObjectFileMachO.cpp Sun Nov 6 20:39:37 2016
@@ -667,8 +667,12 @@ public:
// x0-x29 + fp + lr + sp + pc (== 33 64-bit registers) plus cpsr (1
// 32-bit register)
if (count >= (33 * 2) + 1) {
- for (uint32_t i = 0; i < 33; ++i)
+ for (uint32_t i = 0; i < 29; ++i)
gpr.x[i] = data.GetU64(&offset);
+ gpr.fp = data.GetU64(&offset);
+ gpr.lr = data.GetU64(&offset);
+ gpr.sp = data.GetU64(&offset);
+ gpr.pc = data.GetU64(&offset);
gpr.cpsr = data.GetU32(&offset);
SetError(GPRRegSet, Read, 0);
}
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list