[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D26188: [RFC] Solve linking inconsistency, proposal one

[Pavel Labath via lldb-commits]

labath added a comment.

Ok, I guess we're leaning towards option two then, which is more-or-less status quo as well. I am going to leave this open for a while in case anyone has more input.

Todd, for you this means that you cannot export *all* symbols from liblldb, as that would break the link. The current solution of just exporting lldb_private should be fine though, and llvm symbols are not likely to show up in the backtrace output anyway.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D26188