[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D24385: MinidumpParsing: pid, modules, exceptions

Zachary Turner via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Sep 9 17:45:28 PDT 2016


Even if it's length prefixed, the logic here basically just consumes the
entire buffer, which doesn't seem right
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 5:43 PM Adrian McCarthy <amccarth at google.com> wrote:

> amccarth added inline comments.
>
> ================
> Comment at: source/Plugins/Process/minidump/MinidumpTypes.cpp:21
> @@ +20,3 @@
> +llvm::StringRef
> +lldb_private::minidump::consumeString(llvm::ArrayRef<uint8_t> &Buffer) {
> +  return llvm::StringRef(reinterpret_cast<const char *>(Buffer.data()),
> ----------------
> zturner wrote:
> > labath wrote:
> > > This is not consistent with the consumeObject function, which also
> drops the consumed bytes from the buffer.
> > Is this logic correct?  A buffer may be arbitrarily large and have more
> data in it besides the string.  Perhaps you need to search forward for a
> null terminator, then only return that portion of the string, then drop
> that many bytes (plus the null terminator) from the input buffer?
> Minidump strings aren't zero-terminated.  They're counted (in UTF16 code
> units).  So this would have to read the count and "consume" the appropriate
> number of bytes.
>
> Oh, but this isn't used for minidump strings.  It looks like it's for
> these Linux proc status fields.
>
>
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D24385
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20160910/02b1265d/attachment.html>


More information about the lldb-commits mailing list