[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r278304 - Fix a problem where if a uint64_t value is placed into a python dictionary and sent up to LLDB and converted to StructuredData, it would not be able to parse the full 64 bit value. A number like 0xf000000000000000L could be placed into a dictionary, and sent to LLDB and it would end up being 0xffffffffffffffff since it would overflow a int64_t. We leave the old code there, but if it overflows, we treat the number like a uint64_t and get it to decode correctly. Added a gtest to cover this...
Greg Clayton via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 10 16:25:57 PDT 2016
Author: gclayton
Date: Wed Aug 10 18:25:57 2016
New Revision: 278304
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=278304&view=rev
Log:
Fix a problem where if a uint64_t value is placed into a python dictionary and sent up to LLDB and converted to StructuredData, it would not be able to parse the full 64 bit value. A number like 0xf000000000000000L could be placed into a dictionary, and sent to LLDB and it would end up being 0xffffffffffffffff since it would overflow a int64_t. We leave the old code there, but if it overflows, we treat the number like a uint64_t and get it to decode correctly. Added a gtest to cover this so we don't regress. I verified the gtest failed prior to the fix, and it succeeds after it.
<rdar://problem/27409265>
Modified:
lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/PythonDataObjects.cpp
lldb/trunk/unittests/ScriptInterpreter/Python/PythonDataObjectsTests.cpp
Modified: lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/PythonDataObjects.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/PythonDataObjects.cpp?rev=278304&r1=278303&r2=278304&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/PythonDataObjects.cpp (original)
+++ lldb/trunk/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/PythonDataObjects.cpp Wed Aug 10 18:25:57 2016
@@ -624,7 +624,18 @@ PythonInteger::GetInteger() const
{
assert(PyLong_Check(m_py_obj) && "PythonInteger::GetInteger has a PyObject that isn't a PyLong");
- return PyLong_AsLongLong(m_py_obj);
+ int overflow = 0;
+ int64_t result = PyLong_AsLongLongAndOverflow(m_py_obj, &overflow);
+ if (overflow != 0)
+ {
+ // We got an integer that overflows, like 18446744072853913392L
+ // we can't use PyLong_AsLongLong() as it will return
+ // 0xffffffffffffffff. If we use the unsigned long long
+ // it will work as expected.
+ const uint64_t uval = PyLong_AsUnsignedLongLong(m_py_obj);
+ result = *((int64_t *)&uval);
+ }
+ return result;
}
return UINT64_MAX;
}
Modified: lldb/trunk/unittests/ScriptInterpreter/Python/PythonDataObjectsTests.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/lldb/trunk/unittests/ScriptInterpreter/Python/PythonDataObjectsTests.cpp?rev=278304&r1=278303&r2=278304&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- lldb/trunk/unittests/ScriptInterpreter/Python/PythonDataObjectsTests.cpp (original)
+++ lldb/trunk/unittests/ScriptInterpreter/Python/PythonDataObjectsTests.cpp Wed Aug 10 18:25:57 2016
@@ -595,3 +595,27 @@ TEST_F(PythonDataObjectsTest, TestObject
EXPECT_TRUE(numerator_attr.IsAllocated());
EXPECT_EQ(42, numerator_attr.GetInteger());
}
+
+TEST_F(PythonDataObjectsTest, TestExtractingUInt64ThroughStructuredData)
+{
+ // Make up a custom dictionary with "sys" pointing to the `sys` module.
+ const char *key_name = "addr";
+ const uint64_t value = 0xf000000000000000ull;
+ PythonDictionary python_dict(PyInitialValue::Empty);
+ PythonInteger python_ull_value(PyRefType::Owned, PyLong_FromUnsignedLongLong(value));
+ python_dict.SetItemForKey(PythonString(key_name), python_ull_value);
+ StructuredData::ObjectSP structured_data_sp = python_dict.CreateStructuredObject();
+ EXPECT_TRUE((bool)structured_data_sp);
+ if (structured_data_sp)
+ {
+ StructuredData::Dictionary *structured_dict_ptr = structured_data_sp->GetAsDictionary();
+ EXPECT_TRUE(structured_dict_ptr != nullptr);
+ if (structured_dict_ptr)
+ {
+ StructuredData::ObjectSP structured_addr_value_sp = structured_dict_ptr->GetValueForKey(key_name);
+ EXPECT_TRUE((bool)structured_addr_value_sp);
+ const uint64_t extracted_value = structured_addr_value_sp->GetIntegerValue(123);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(extracted_value == value);
+ }
+ }
+}
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list