[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D22463: [RFC] Moving to GitHub Proposal: NOT DECISION!
Jonathan Roelofs via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jul 18 08:49:31 PDT 2016
jroelofs added a subscriber: jroelofs.
================
Comment at: docs/Proposals/GitHub.rst:127
@@ +126,3 @@
+* The projects' repositories will remain identical, with a new address (GitHub).
+* They'll continue to have SVN RW access, but will also gain Git RW access.
+* The linear history can still be accessed in the (RO) submodule meta project,
----------------
rengolin wrote:
> compnerd wrote:
> > jroelofs wrote:
> > > Do you mean `s/SVN RW access/SVN RO access/` here?
> > I believe @rengolin is referring to the final state here. I agree that the current phrasing makes it hard to follow.
> No, I actually mean SVN RW access. GitHub's SVN view does allow write access to the Git repos via "svn commit".
Ah, I didn't catch that part. Cool.
================
Comment at: docs/Proposals/GitHub.rst:136
@@ +135,3 @@
+Essentially, we're adding Git RW access in addition to the already existing
+structure, with all the additional benefits of it being in GitHub.
+
----------------
rengolin wrote:
> compnerd wrote:
> > jroelofs wrote:
> > > Need to clarify here whether *write* access through SVN will be going away. If I understand the proposal correctly, it will go away, but this section makes it sound like it's staying.
> > The way that I read the nutshell is that it would potentially continue to exist, just at a different address.
> Our SVN server will die, SVN access will continue via GitHub.
Ah, ok.
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22463
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list