[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D20106: Generalize child process monitoring functions

[Pavel Labath via lldb-commits]

labath added a comment.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20106#426224, @zturner wrote:

> It's too bad llvm doesn't have an equivalent of boost::any, because that
>  would be perfect here :-/


I actually think that a `std::function` is better here than an `any` type because it ensures type safety (even though `std::function` will use something equivalent to `any` underneath). What makes this API slightly cumbersome in my mind is the fact that we have 4 arguments which we are forwarding. If we condensed that into say 2 (pid, and a `struct StopInfo`), then I think it would be perfect.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D20106