[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r265461 - XFail TestImport.py on Windows because Python 3 import rules don't work that way.

Adrian McCarthy via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Apr 6 07:53:23 PDT 2016


It will still be a bit of a trick to change the `command script import`
handling to do `from foo import blah` in the general case, since foo can't
really be an absolute file path.

And does the `from __future__ import absolute_import` really belong in the
script your importing?  Or does it belong in the temp script that's written
to do the import?  I would have thought the latter from everything I read
yesterday.

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote:

> Afaik there's no way to do from future imports with the c api, and
> executing the statement with RunOneLine doesn't do it either, it has to be
> in the script because it's treated specially by the interpreter.
>
> There might be a way to do it with some tricks that I didn't figure out
> last time.
>
> If its any consolation, it would only be needed for shared/builtin
> formatters.
>
> I guess it would help to get a better understanding of what the problem
> is, if someone files a bug against me (or i can file it myself tomorrow) i
> can investigate after I finish PDB stuff.
>
> In the meantime having it in seems like the best option imo
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:54 PM Jim Ingham <jingham at apple.com> wrote:
>
>> Will this be necessary for everybody who uses "command script import"
>> with Python 3?  If so, it would be really nice to do this work in "command
>> script import" if possible.  Otherwise everybody will have to put this goo
>> at the top of every .py file they write for formatters & breakpoint
>> commands and the like.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>>
>> > On Apr 5, 2016, at 5:30 PM, Zachary Turner via lldb-commits <
>> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Yea I wasn't sure if the . would be necessary or not.  If you write
>> "from __future__ import absolute_import" at the top of each of these python
>> files (foo.py and foo2.py or whatever they're called) then this should
>> guarantee that the behavior is the same in both Python 2 and Python 3
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:01 PM Adrian McCarthy <amccarth at google.com>
>> wrote:
>> > "error: module importing failed: Parent module '' not loaded, cannot
>> perform relative import"
>> >
>> > If you omit the dot (i.e., `from foo import foo2`), it appears to work,
>> but I'm not sure that does the right thing.  I'll keep investigating.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Without the modification to sys.path
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 3:39 PM Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Can you try to change "import foo2" to "from .foo import foo2"
>> > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 2:52 PM Adrian McCarthy <amccarth at google.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I've drilled down into the Python import statement.  It's in
>> ScriptInterpreterPython::LoadScriptingModule.  The function inserts the
>> diretory into sys.path and then issues a vanilla Python import statement.
>> >
>> > I spoke with one of our local Python experts who said that this
>> technique to specify the directory is probably unreliable, as the rules for
>> where Python looks for modules has evolved.  The rules for both relative
>> and absolute module paths changed from Python 2 to 3.
>> >
>> > I'll revert the xfail if you want.  But this has been broken for quite
>> a while (as has another test, which I'm looking into now).
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I think we need some more information before we xfail this. It would
>> help to drill down to either the python import statement or the
>> PyImport_ImportModule C api call that actually does the import.
>> >
>> > If you can get that, i can help come up with a fix. Just need to step
>> through the execution of the command until you get to the python or c code
>> that tries to do the import
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 1:54 PM Adrian McCarthy via lldb-commits <
>> lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> > Author: amccarth
>> > Date: Tue Apr  5 15:49:09 2016
>> > New Revision: 265461
>> >
>> > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=265461&view=rev
>> > Log:
>> > XFail TestImport.py on Windows because Python 3 import rules don't work
>> that way.
>> >
>> > Modified:
>> >
>>  lldb/trunk/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/command_script/import/TestImport.py
>> >
>> > Modified:
>> lldb/trunk/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/command_script/import/TestImport.py
>> > URL:
>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/lldb/trunk/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/command_script/import/TestImport.py?rev=265461&r1=265460&r2=265461&view=diff
>> >
>> ==============================================================================
>> > ---
>> lldb/trunk/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/command_script/import/TestImport.py
>> (original)
>> > +++
>> lldb/trunk/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/command_script/import/TestImport.py
>> Tue Apr  5 15:49:09 2016
>> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ class ImportTestCase(TestBase):
>> >
>> >      @add_test_categories(['pyapi'])
>> >      @no_debug_info_test
>> > +    @expectedFailureAll(oslist=["windows"], bugnumber="
>> llvm.org/pr27227: Python 3 import rules are different")
>> >      def test_import_command(self):
>> >          """Import some Python scripts by path and test them"""
>> >          self.run_test()
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > lldb-commits mailing list
>> > lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
>> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > lldb-commits mailing list
>> > lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
>> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20160406/99564ace/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the lldb-commits mailing list