[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D16936: Remove expectedFailureWindows decorator
Zachary Turner via lldb-commits
lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 8 10:35:21 PST 2016
zturner added a comment.
I'm not opposed to it in principle, but I think we should optimize the design for conciseness at the point where you decorate a class or function. If it makes the point of decoration more verbose or harder to read, then I would probably be against it. I guess I'd need to see a proposed syntax for what you want it to look like when you decorate a function.
More information about the lldb-commits