[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D16936: Remove expectedFailureWindows decorator

[Zachary Turner via lldb-commits]

zturner added a comment.

I'm not opposed to it in principle, but I think we should optimize the design for conciseness at the point where you decorate a class or function.  If it makes the point of decoration more verbose or harder to read, then I would probably be against it.  I guess I'd need to see a proposed syntax for what you want it to look like when you decorate a function.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D16936