[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D16936: Remove expectedFailureWindows decorator

Pavel Labath via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 8 02:40:59 PST 2016

labath accepted this revision.
labath added a comment.

I agree with the idea in general, but I wanted to ask what is your plan with the android decorators: For them we use the additional `api_levels` flag, which does not exist on other platforms/decorators. I suppose we could add that flag to `expectedFailureAll`, but I am not sure if that would be a good idea...

Also, since we are doing all this refactoring, one more improvement I can think of is renaming `expectedFailureAll` to `expectedFailure`. It was named `All` because we already have an `expectedFailure` function, but I think that one is now more of an implementation detail and could be renamed to something else. Up to you...


More information about the lldb-commits mailing list