[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D16334: Fix TestSignedTypes.py by removing a bogus step-over

[Zachary Turner via lldb-commits]

zturner added a comment.

For example, what if someone adds a test that uses a very small amount of functionality but tests the thing it's supposed to test.  Do we block the change and say "please make this test more complicated, we want to test as much stuff as possible"?  Of course not.  It's ridiculous right?

It sounds like at least 2 people on this thread know of specific areas where we're lacking test coverage.  Why not spend a few days doing nothing but improving test coverage?


http://reviews.llvm.org/D16334