[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D16186: Unconditionally accept symbol sizes from .dynsym

Greg Clayton via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jan 14 09:28:36 PST 2016


clayborg added a comment.

So does this mean any symbols whose byte size is zero will always have a byte size of zero when parsed from a .dynsym section? What kinds of symbols have a byte size of zero in the .dynsym? Seems like function symbols should always have a valid byte size no? Why is the confusing the unwinder? How does the unwinder treat symbols differently when they have a byte size of zero after your fix and how does this fix your issues?


http://reviews.llvm.org/D16186





More information about the lldb-commits mailing list