[Lldb-commits] [lldb-dev] [lldb] r253317 - Add Pythonic language binding wrapper generation script.

[Zachary Turner via lldb-commits]

(This is originally from a thread on lldb-commits, but it seems more
appropriate here, so I'm responding here.

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:47 PM Todd Fiala <todd.fiala at gmail.com> wrote:

> BTW if you cook up something on the swig-as-a-service end that ends up
> working to eliminate the need for swig, I'll be happy to remove the static
> binding support at that point.
>
> -Todd
>


Err, rewind.  If we have the swig as a service, then I think the static
binding does have value.  Because I don't want to hit the network every
single time I build, so it mostly solves the issue you mentioned about
network connectivity, because building LLDB doesn't require a network
connection unless you touch a swig interface file.

The thing I would like some guidance on from the Apple side is this: If I
make the swig service, can you (and will you) use code generated by swig
3.x?  If not, there's no value in the swig service.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20151118/2fe13b66/attachment.html>