[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D13778: [SBValue] Add a method HasChildAtIndex.

Enrico Granata via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Oct 15 11:28:46 PDT 2015

granata.enrico added a comment.

What do you plan to use this has_child_at_index call for?

My concern is that it adds complication to the synthetic child provider interface. Yes, I understand it is optional, but it seems like yet another thing in the "any children?" realm that I would rather much avoid if possible. Which is why my question. Let's start from the use case and see if we can come up with anything else that could cover it.


More information about the lldb-commits mailing list