[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D13028: Merge dsym and dwarf test cases

Zachary Turner via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Sep 22 10:44:03 PDT 2015

At some point I really would love to reduce the number of decorators.  It's
starting to get ridiculous :)

Seems like we only need one decorator that takes everything as optional

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:42 AM Tamas Berghammer <tberghammer at google.com>

> tberghammer added a comment.
> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D13028#250822, @clayborg wrote:
> > Looks good. For the failing test cases, just check this stuff in and we
> should take care or marking any needed tests and expected fail. Is there a
> way to mark a test such that the "dwarf in .o files" will expected fail if
> we need to do that? If there currently isn't, we need to add the ability to
> say that normal dwarf (dSYM file for MacOSX or dwarf in object file for all
> other platforms), DWO, and dwarf in .o files (apple) can be marked as
> expected fail, skip, etc...
> I added an [expectedFailure,expectedFlakey,skipIf][Dwarf,Dsym] (will add
> Dwo whit the rest of the dwo specific logic) decorators and we can also
> specify the debug info for expectedFailureAll. If we need more decorators
> then we can add them the first time we have to use them (the debug info
> fomrat is stored in self.debug_info as a string)
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D13028
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20150922/a71289ae/attachment.html>

More information about the lldb-commits mailing list