[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D12899: cmake fixups: post-build python step dependency and lldb-server dependency for lldb on Linux

Tamas Berghammer via lldb-commits lldb-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Sep 18 08:22:18 PDT 2015

tberghammer added a subscriber: tberghammer.
tberghammer added a comment.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12899#248654, @ki.stfu wrote:

> In http://reviews.llvm.org/D12899#248648, @zturner wrote:
> > One possible solution is to make an lldb-all target.
> As I said, it would much better rather than changing lldb dependencies. But I'm still not sure, do we really need something like lldb-all? Why we can't use "ninja" (i.e. without arguments) for building a whole LLDB?

"ninja" without any argument builds everything including llvm, clang and a lot of related tools what increase the link time by a lot (assuming something changed in the llvm/clang repository since the last build).


More information about the lldb-commits mailing list