[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D11461: Improve C++ function name handling and step-in avoid regerxp handling

[Jim Ingham]

jingham added a subscriber: jingham.
jingham added a comment.

I'm fine with this.  It doesn't seem very useful to include the return type of templates in the name that the step-avoid regexp matches, especially since it would make the "no functions implemented in std::" regexp extremely tedious to try and write...

Jim


http://reviews.llvm.org/D11461