[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] TestPrintStackTraces - made XFAIL more precise
Vince Harron
vince at nethacker.com
Tue Mar 31 09:53:05 PDT 2015
Hi Greg,
Do you want us to wait for review from you on changes that are fairly Linux specific?
================
Comment at: test/python_api/lldbutil/process/TestPrintStackTraces.py:34
@@ +33,3 @@
+ if self.getArchitecture() in ['i386'] and "linux" in sys.platform:
+ self.skipTest("Skipping because this test is known to fail on i386 Linux")
+
----------------
sivachandra wrote:
> The test is already marked xfail for i386 and linux. Why have this?
It was marked as expectedFailureLinux but seems to be passing on x86_64.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8677
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list