[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] Fixes http://reviews.llvm.org/rL230691
Zachary Turner
zturner at google.com
Fri Feb 27 10:16:35 PST 2015
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D7933#131286, @clayborg wrote:
> I meant to say I like the other fix that uses pthread_condion_t and pthread_mutex_t since it won't spin like this fix will. Please use the other one.
Just to be clear, are you saying you don't want C++11 at all? Or that you just want a condition variable instead of a spinlock? Because if you just want a condition variable, then we should go with the C++11 and std::condition_variable as I suggested, since the test will work on platforms that don't have pthreads.
REPOSITORY
rL LLVM
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7933
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list