[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] Skip lldb-mi tests on FreeBSD for now

[Vince Harron]

> To be clear, you're advocating for adding decorators to all of the
lldb-mi tests, and then having others remove them from the tests that
are known-good?

I was advocating your simple disable all approach if the majority of tests
are flaky and letting the lldb-mi guys do the work of re-enabling one at a
time.

That said, the lldb-mi guys prefer annotating so if it's all the same to
you, go forth and annotate.

Vince



On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:

> On 18 February 2015 at 14:01, Vince Harron <vharron at google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We need as many tests as possible.  I think that the lldb-mi tests are
> incredibly valuable.  Thanks to the lldb-mi team for that!
> >
> > Looking over the Linux builders, I'm noticing that the lldb-mi tests are
> changing state frequently.  I think that Ed should submit this change for
> now.  I'd also like him to disable the tests on Linux for now.
>
> To be clear, you're advocating for adding decorators to all of the
> lldb-mi tests, and then having others remove them from the tests that
> are known-good?
>
> @skipIfFreeBSD # llvm.org/pr22411: Failure presumably due to known thread
> races
> @skipIfLinux # llvm.org/pr22411: Failure presumably due to known thread
> races
>



-- 

Vince Harron | Technical Lead Manager | vharron at google.com | 858-442-0868
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20150218/7c539aa8/attachment.html>