[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] First cut of PowerPC(64) support in LLDB.

Greg Clayton clayborg at gmail.com
Thu Oct 30 13:55:04 PDT 2014

Ah, I see what you mean about the static assert. In that case can you just use the "ppc" and "ppc64" entries? Or rename them to be "powerpc" and "powerpc64"? We want our triples to match what llvm uses for PowerPC so if llvm doesn't use "ppc" or "ppc64", just rename the entries in the "g_core_definitions" table, otherwise, use the "ppc" and "ppc64" entries.


More information about the lldb-commits mailing list