[Lldb-commits] Fix a bug with order of operations

[Zachary Turner]

Bump.  This looks pretty benign to me so I'll probably go ahead and commit
without review if I don't hear back in the next, say, 6 hours or so.


On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote:

> I accidentally reversed the conditional on this patch.  A corrected patch
> is attached.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> Looks like a simple bug where it should have been "a | b | (c ? 0 : d)"
>> instead of "a | b | c ? 0 : d".  Rather than rely on order of operations,
>> which I always find confusing, I opted to just move this out into explicit
>> initialization of the flags.
>>
>> Let me know if the new code matches your original intent.
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20140718/3d731e9b/attachment.html>