[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] ObjectFileELF::GetSectionHeaderInfo sets arch_spec unnecessarily

[Todd Fiala]

I've checked in the first patch here (minor tweak to comment):
Sending        source/Plugins/ObjectFile/ELF/ObjectFileELF.cpp
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 212822.

I'm looking at the second one now.


On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Todd Fiala <tfiala at google.com> wrote:

> Okay - so you're not aware then of any cases where we build ObjectFileELF
> files incrementally and might need to re-parse the headers to incrementally
> pick up anything new? (I'm not aware of it but just raise it as "Do we do
> this anywhere?").
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Ed Maste <emaste at freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>> On 11 July 2014 10:50, Todd Fiala <tfiala at google.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I was about to give his second patch a look now.  When you looked at
>> it, you were looking at his first one, is that correct?  Any thoughts on
>> the second one?
>>
>> That's correct - I was specifically talking about the first patch.
>>
>> I do not believe the second patch will break anything for me -- if we
>> have an ELF file with no sections then m_section_headers.empty() will
>> be true, and we'll just have an additional ParseSectionHeaders() call,
>> as we do today.  Either way I think the first patch is correct and
>> that we should apply it, regardless of whether we also apply the
>> second patch.  If m_section_headers is not empty() then we must have
>> already parsed the section headers so should not fall back to the
>> defaults.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Fiala | Software Engineer |  tfiala at google.com |  650-943-3180
>



-- 
Todd Fiala | Software Engineer | tfiala at google.com | 650-943-3180
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20140711/f4cd987e/attachment.html>