[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] lldb - __arm64__ vs __aarch64__ insanity
Todd Fiala
tfiala at google.com
Wed Jul 9 15:20:28 PDT 2014
Ah okay!
Good, was hoping to save you some trouble :-)
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Paul Osmialowski <pawelo at king.net.pl>
wrote:
> Hey Todd,
>
> Talking about 'the plan', I was refering to your conclusion not to your
> question itself, I'm sorry for that confusing answer. I'm familiarizing
> with this new lldb-gdbserver, following your advice.
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2014, Todd Fiala wrote:
>
> -reviews
>> Hey Paul,
>>
>> I just want to re-iterate something in case that wasn't totally clear.
>> We are deprecating debugserver and moving over to lldb-gdbserver. Are you
>> sure you want to bring up a new platform on debugserver,
>> knowing that we are going to deprecate that exe in the near-ish future
>> and we've already got linux x86_64 mostly working with lldb-gdbserver,
>> which is meant to be (and will be) a drop in replacement for
>> debugserver?
>>
>> -Todd
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Paul Osmialowski <pawelo at king.net.pl>
>> wrote:
>> Hey Todd,
>>
>> That's the plan. This patch is a merely step towards this - it just
>> clears
>> all the confusion caused by this double naming used by different
>> toolchains.
>>
>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D4379
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Todd Fiala |
>> Software Engineer |
>> tfiala at google.com |
>> 650-943-3180
>>
>>
--
Todd Fiala | Software Engineer | tfiala at google.com | 650-943-3180
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20140709/1066c170/attachment.html>
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list