[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] Allow specification of no source display on stop
Randy Smith
rdsmith at chromium.org
Tue Jul 8 13:43:19 PDT 2014
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Todd Fiala <tfiala at google.com> wrote:
> I'll have a run through with it and then I'll submit it.
>
> Here are the tests that currently fail for me intermittently on Linux:
>
> TestConvenienceVariables.py
> TestFormatters.py
> TestLongjmp.py
> Test-rdar-9974002.py
> TestWatchpointMultipleThreads.py
>
> There might be one more in there, but those are the set I see most
> frequently at TOT.
>
FWIW, I'm also seeing the following tests sometimes fail for me on Linux at
TOT (== r212559 in this case):
TestStopHookMultipleThreads.py
TestCallStopAndContinue.py
-- Randy
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Randy Smith <rdsmith at chromium.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Greg Clayton <gclayton at apple.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Looks fine to me if the test suite is happy with the changes.
>>>
>>
>> No failures on Linux other than failures I've also seen on trunk
>> (TestConvenienceVariables.py is consistently failing on Linux for me).
>>
>> Willing to land it for me? This is my first patch, so unless I'm told
>> differently (:-}) I'm going with the LLVM process of submitting patches for
>> a while rather than asking for commit access up front. (I do intend to
>> make multiple contributions to lldb over the coming weeks/months.)
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -- Randy
>>
>>
>>> Greg
>>>
>>> > On Jul 3, 2014, at 11:42 AM, Randy Smith <rdsmith at chromium.org> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Based on r212225. I've sketched out my rationale for this change in
>>> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20149. It's fairly simple; is
>>> someone willing to take a look?
>>> >
>>> > Note that I don't (yet) have commit access, so if this patch is
>>> approved someone will need to land it for me. (I found the LLVM and LLDB
>>> pages not completely consistent around the process for gaining commit
>>> access, so I'm going with the LLVM "contribute several patches and then
>>> ask".)
>>> >
>>> > I ran the "check-lldb" test suite on Linux, and found no difference in
>>> results between r212225 and r212225+my patch. (As a side note, what should
>>> I expect from the Linux test suite? TestConvenienceVariables.py is failing
>>> for me at top of tree.)
>>> >
>>> > -- Randy
>>> >
>>> > <sourcedisp.diff>_______________________________________________
>>> > lldb-commits mailing list
>>> > lldb-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lldb-commits mailing list
>> lldb-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Todd Fiala | Software Engineer | tfiala at google.com | 650-943-3180
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20140708/e9c4517f/attachment.html>
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list