[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] Don't use a random probe / allocation scheme in the IRMemoryMap

Zachary Turner zturner at google.com
Mon Jul 7 13:11:48 PDT 2014

Bump for the new week.  Hopefully can get some traction this week.

On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Todd Fiala <tfiala at google.com> wrote:

> I don't see any new test failures with this.  The (lldb) expr command
> seems to be working fine in a remote inferior process.
> The only change I'd like to see if the renaming the shadowed variable to a
> different name.
> I have an open question on the lifetime of an IRMemoryMap and whether we
> care about holes that develop, and whether we want new allocations to
> always come at the end of the range if this persists.  However, if it is
> relatively short lived, this probably isn't a big deal.
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D4300
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20140707/7d63b99d/attachment.html>

More information about the lldb-commits mailing list