[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r208423 - Documented our "attach" extension packets.
mg11 at csr.com
Mon May 12 22:29:51 PDT 2014
Thanks for clarifying this, Jim. For the embedded sys I'm looking at
that's probably not a concern, but thanks for clearing it up.
jingham at apple.com wrote:
> No, in that case something in the system is expected to make the process appear. This feature is for catching daemon processes that get launched by the system on behalf of other processes. The debugger is just expected to poll waiting for the process to show up.
> On May 11, 2014, at 10:34 PM, Matthew Gardiner <mg11 at csr.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for providing the documentation, Jim.
>> So in the case of vAttachOrWait, if the process is not already there, what entity is responsible for the launching of it? Would that be the stub itself, or is this where lldb-platform steps in?
Member of the CSR plc group of companies. CSR plc registered in England and Wales, registered number 4187346, registered office Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, United Kingdom
More information can be found at www.csr.com. Keep up to date with CSR on our technical blog, www.csr.com/blog, CSR people blog, www.csr.com/people, YouTube, www.youtube.com/user/CSRplc, Facebook, www.facebook.com/pages/CSR/191038434253534, or follow us on Twitter at www.twitter.com/CSR_plc.
New for 2014, you can now access the wide range of products powered by aptX at www.aptx.com.
More information about the lldb-commits