[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r116822 - /lldb/trunk/docs/testsuite/a-detailed-walkthrough.txt

Tue Oct 19 10:37:52 PDT 2010

Author: johnny
Date: Tue Oct 19 12:37:52 2010
New Revision: 116822

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=116822&view=rev
Log:
Initial version of a detailed walkthrough of a test case (test/settings/TestSettings.py).
It's an in-progress snapshot, and not complete.

Added:
    lldb/trunk/docs/testsuite/a-detailed-walkthrough.txt

Added: lldb/trunk/docs/testsuite/a-detailed-walkthrough.txt
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/lldb/trunk/docs/testsuite/a-detailed-walkthrough.txt?rev=116822&view=auto
==============================================================================

--- lldb/trunk/docs/testsuite/a-detailed-walkthrough.txt (added)
+++ lldb/trunk/docs/testsuite/a-detailed-walkthrough.txt Tue Oct 19 12:37:52 2010
@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
+Let's pick test/settings/TestSettings.py as our example.  First, notice the file
+name "TestSettings.py", the Test*.py pattern is the default mechanism that the
+test driver uses for discovery of tests.  As to TestSettings.py, it defines a
+class:
+
+class SettingsCommandTestCase(TestBase):
+
+derived from TestBase, which is defined in test/lldbtest.py and is itself
+derived from Python's unittest framework's TestCase class.  See also
+http://docs.python.org/library/unittest.html for more details.
+
+To just run the TestSettings.py test, chdir to the lldb test directory, and then
+type the following command:
+
+/Volumes/data/lldb/svn/trunk/test $ ./dotest.py settings
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
+Collected 6 tests
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
+Ran 6 tests in 8.699s
+
+OK (expected failures=1)
+/Volumes/data/lldb/svn/trunk/test $ 
+
+Pass '-v' option to the test driver to also output verbose descriptions of the
+individual test cases and their test status:
+
+/Volumes/data/lldb/svn/trunk/test $ ./dotest.py -v settings
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
+Collected 6 tests
+
+test_set_auto_confirm (TestSettings.SettingsCommandTestCase)
+Test that after 'set auto-confirm true', manual confirmation should not kick in. ... ok
+test_set_output_path (TestSettings.SettingsCommandTestCase)
+Test that setting target.process.output-path for the launched process works. ... expected failure
+test_set_prompt (TestSettings.SettingsCommandTestCase)
+Test that 'set prompt' actually changes the prompt. ... ok
+test_set_term_width (TestSettings.SettingsCommandTestCase)
+Test that 'set term-width' actually changes the term-width. ... ok
+test_with_dsym (TestSettings.SettingsCommandTestCase)
+Test that run-args and env-vars are passed to the launched process. ... ok
+test_with_dwarf (TestSettings.SettingsCommandTestCase)
+Test that run-args and env-vars are passed to the launched process. ... ok
+
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
+Ran 6 tests in 5.735s
+
+OK (expected failures=1)
+/Volumes/data/lldb/svn/trunk/test $ 
+
+Underneath, the '-v' option passes keyword argument verbosity=2 to the
+Python's unittest.TextTestRunner (see also
+http://docs.python.org/library/unittest.html#unittest.TextTestRunner).  For very
+detailed descriptions about what's going on during the test, pass '-t' to the
+test driver, which asks the test driver to trace the commands executed and to
+display their output.  For brevity, the '-t' output is not included here.
+
+Notice the 'expected failures=1' message at the end of the run.  This is because
+of a bug currently in lldb such that setting target.process.output-path to
+'stdout.txt' does not have any effect on the redirection of the standard output
+of the subsequent launched process.  We are using unittest2 (a backport of new
+unittest features for Python 2.4-2.6) to decorate (mark) the particular test
+method as such:
+
+    @unittest2.expectedFailure
+    # rdar://problem/8435794
+    # settings set target.process.output-path does not seem to work
+    def test_set_output_path(self):
+
+See http://pypi.python.org/pypi/unittest2 for more details.
+
+Now let's look inside the test method:
+
+    def test_set_output_path(self):
+        """Test that setting target.process.output-path for the launched process works."""
+        self.buildDefault()
+
+        exe = os.path.join(os.getcwd(), "a.out")
+        self.runCmd("file " + exe, CURRENT_EXECUTABLE_SET)
+
+        # Set the output-path and verify it is set.
+        self.runCmd("settings set target.process.output-path 'stdout.txt'")
+        self.expect("settings show target.process.output-path",
+            startstr = "target.process.output-path (string) = 'stdout.txt'")
+
+        self.runCmd("run", RUN_SUCCEEDED)
+
+        # The 'stdout.txt' file should now exist.
+        self.assertTrue(os.path.isfile("stdout.txt"),
+                        "'stdout.txt' exists due to target.process.output-path.")
+
+        # Read the output file produced by running the program.
+        with open('stdout.txt', 'r') as f:
+            output = f.read()
+
+        self.expect(output, exe=False,
+            startstr = "This message should go to standard out.")
+
+The self.buildDefault() statement is used to build a default binary for this
+test instance.  For this particular test case, since we don't really care what
+debugging format is used, we instruct the build subsystem to build the default
+binary for us.  The base class TestBase has defined three instance methods:
+
+    def buildDefault(self, architecture=None, compiler=None, dictionary=None):
+        """Platform specific way to build the default binaries."""
+        module = __import__(sys.platform)
+        if not module.buildDefault(self, architecture, compiler, dictionary):
+            raise Exception("Don't know how to build default binary")
+
+    def buildDsym(self, architecture=None, compiler=None, dictionary=None):
+        """Platform specific way to build binaries with dsym info."""
+        module = __import__(sys.platform)
+        if not module.buildDsym(self, architecture, compiler, dictionary):
+            raise Exception("Don't know how to build binary with dsym")
+
+    def buildDwarf(self, architecture=None, compiler=None, dictionary=None):
+        """Platform specific way to build binaries with dwarf maps."""
+        module = __import__(sys.platform)
+        if not module.buildDwarf(self, architecture, compiler, dictionary):
+            raise Exception("Don't know how to build binary with dwarf")
+
+And the test/plugins/darwin.py provides the implmentation for all three build
+methods using the makefile mechanism.  We envision that linux plugin can use a
+similar approach to accomplish the task of building the binaries.
+
+Mac OS X provides an additional way to manipulate archived DWARF debug symbol
+files and produces dSYM files.  The buildDsym() instance method is used by the
+test method to build the binary with dsym info.  For an example of this,
+see test/array_types/TestArrayTypes.py:
+
+    @unittest2.skipUnless(sys.platform.startswith("darwin"), "requires Darwin")
+    def test_with_dsym_and_run_command(self):
+        """Test 'frame variable var_name' on some variables with array types."""
+        self.buildDsym()
+        self.array_types()
+
+This method is decorated with a skipUnless decorator so that it will only gets
+included into the test suite if the platform it is running on is 'darwin', aka
+Mac OS X.
+
+Type 'man dsymutil' for more details. 
+
+After the binary is built, it is time to specify the file to be used as the main
+executable by lldb:
+
+        exe = os.path.join(os.getcwd(), "a.out")
+        self.runCmd("file " + exe, CURRENT_EXECUTABLE_SET)
+
+This is where the attribute assignment:
+
+class SettingsCommandTestCase(TestBase):
+
+    mydir = "settings"
+
+which happens right after the SettingsCommandTestCase class declaration comes
+into place.  It specifies the relative directory to the top level 'test' so that
+the test harness runtime can change its working directory in order to find the
+executable as well as the source code files.  The runCmd() method is defined
+in the TestBase base class (within test/lldbtest.py) and its purpose is to pass
+the specified command to the lldb command interpreter.  It's like you're typing
+the command within an interactive lldb session.
+
+The CURRENT_EXECUTABLE_SET is an assert message defined in the lldbtest module
+so that it can reused from other test modules.



